Skip to main content

21 Free Skills Turn Claude Into an MBB-Style Strategist

Oria published 21 free Claude skills for market mapping, competitive intel, and pricing. What it means for a marketing team with no in-house strategist.

21 Free Skills Turn Claude Into an MBB-Style Strategist

Ricardo Argüello

Ricardo Argüello
Ricardo Argüello

CEO & Founder

AI in Marketing 4 min read

On May 26, 2026, a company called Oria published something almost nobody in Central American marketing noticed: a free pack of 21 skills for Claude that walk the model, step by step, through the same kind of analysis a McKinsey, BCG, or Bain engagement would charge you hundreds of thousands of dollars to deliver. Situation diagnosis, market mapping, competitive intelligence, customer segmentation, pricing strategy, executive narrative building. Six domains, 21 moves, sequenced exactly the way a real strategy team would use them on an actual engagement.

No enterprise Claude plan needed, no complex integration. The pack runs on a standard account using Projects and Project Knowledge. It’s aimed at 30,000-plus consultants, bankers, and private equity professionals, according to Oria’s own page. But of the 21 skills, eight are exactly the work most marketing teams without an in-house strategist are missing today: market mapping, competitive intelligence, customer segmentation, profit pool analysis, pricing strategy, initiative prioritization, stakeholder alignment, and narrative built on the Pyramid Principle.

What actually changes for a marketing team with no strategist

If you work in marketing at a mid-sized company in Honduras, Costa Rica, or anywhere else in Central America, odds are you’ve never had access to a competitive intelligence analysis built with real consulting methodology. Not because you don’t need it, but because hiring that work costs what it costs, and building it in-house takes someone with that specific training, which most Central American marketing teams simply don’t carry on payroll.

That’s what a pack like Oria’s changes. You no longer need that specific training to produce the document with the correct structure. Ask Claude to run the market-mapping skill on your category and you get a market map with the format a senior analyst would produce. Ask it to run customer segmentation on your base and you get segments with the level of detail you used to only see in an expensive consulting proposal.

That part is real, and it’s useful. It’s also exactly where the problem starts.

The right document isn’t the right decision

A well-structured market map still depends on what assumptions you fed Claude when you asked for it: what you consider your category, what market data you gave it as a base, which competitors you included and which you left out. A well-formatted customer segmentation still depends on whether the data in your base actually reflects purchase behavior or just surface-level demographics. A well-built executive narrative using the Pyramid Principle still depends on whether the core message you gave it as a starting point was the right one.

Oria’s pack gives you the structure. It doesn’t validate the assumptions you put in, and catching exactly that kind of error is precisely what a senior consultant exists for, before a company builds a full campaign on top of a wrong assumption. Running all 21 skills without that filter isn’t the same as having an in-house marketing strategist. It’s having 21 correctly formatted documents with no quality control on what’s inside them. It’s the same distinction we wrote about with cognitive delegation versus cognitive surrender: the skill gets you to where you already decided to go faster, it doesn’t decide where to go.

Where the real work sits now

This isn’t a reason to skip the pack. It’s a reason to design, before you start, where in the workflow someone on the team checks the assumption before the analysis turns into a campaign decision. In practice that means three concrete things. First, define upfront what data source feeds each skill, so Claude doesn’t fill in with generic assumptions what should come from your actual information. Second, assign one specific person on the team to review the output before it moves to execution, not as a formality but with the explicit question of whether the underlying assumption makes sense for your business. Third, treat every skill’s output like a fast junior analyst’s first draft, not a senior partner’s final word.

In Growth Strategy engagements, this is exactly the kind of design decision we work through with marketing teams. Not whether to use AI to speed up strategic analysis, but exactly where human judgment stays in the process so a bad assumption doesn’t turn into a full campaign. We’ve written before about what became possible in marketing once a team stops asking only what to automate, and this skill pack is the newest version of that same question.

Oria’s pack removed a real barrier for Central American marketing teams. You no longer have to pay for the structure of a consulting-grade analysis. What still costs, and will keep costing, is knowing whether whatever produced that structure got it right.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude skills Oria marketing strategy competitive intelligence AI Maestro Growth Strategy Anthropic

Related Articles

Marketing Doesn't Need More AI. It Needs Less Sediment.
AI in Marketing
· 6 min read

Marketing Doesn't Need More AI. It Needs Less Sediment.

Before you automate a marketing workflow with AI, ask if you'd design it the same way today. If the answer is no, AI just gives you faster sediment

B2B marketing marketing automation marketing operations
IKEA didn't fire 8,500. It found €1.3 billion.
AI in Marketing
· 5 min read

IKEA didn't fire 8,500. It found €1.3 billion.

IKEA's bot resolved 47% of inquiries. The value was the other 53%: the demand map almost no team measures, and the one IKEA turned into a business.

IKEA AI marketing customer experience